Skip to content

News

What freight RFPs already ask for this tender season, and why

In the fourth quarter (Q4), shippers renew their contracts with carriers and forwarders for next year, and this is the tender season. A new requirement now appears in the tender documents: a request for emissions data that is structured and documents the calculation method. Two years ago this requirement was not there. Today, price and transit time are no longer the only questions.

Why this is happening now

We have written before about why freight carriers must provide data that others can use. Shippers that fall under CSRD, the EU sustainability reporting law, must report their Scope 3 Category 4 emissions. These are the emissions from the freight they buy. An assurance team, the independent reviewer of the report, must be able to check these figures. As a result, a spend-based estimate from a carrier, which is calculated from money spent and not from real activity, no longer meets that need.

What has changed since then is that the requirement is no longer only a topic of discussion. It is now written into the tender documents, and shippers are issuing documents this quarter that score it for next year's contracts.

What the tenders specifically ask for

The requests we see have the same four parts. They come from a shipper's procurement team, or from a forwarder who passes the requirement on to the carriers it books:

  • A named method: ISO 14083, the international standard for freight emissions, and the GLEC Framework, the industry guide to applying it. A general statement such as "we calculate our carbon footprint" is not enough.
  • Data quality tier disclosure. The bidder says whether the figure comes from real fuel receipts or from a regional default value.
  • Data for each shipment, not an annual average for the whole company. The shipper needs this to assign emissions to the goods that really move through its supply chain.
  • A format the shipper can use in its own CSRD process without changing it. A GLEC Declaration is such a format, which is a standard "carbon receipt" that a carrier attaches to a shipment. Shippers expect it more and more, instead of a custom PDF.

None of this is unusual. It is the same shared problem seen from the shipper, forwarder and carrier side, and now it is written into contract language.

What this means for carriers and forwarders bidding this season

Price and transit time used to be the whole scorecard. Now data quality is also scored in a growing share of the RFPs that arrive this quarter. It is no longer an optional question at the end of the form. A carrier can answer with a named method, a stated data quality tier and a figure for each shipment. That carrier answers what the bid really asks. In contrast, a carrier that offers only an industry-average estimate answers less than the bid asks, and the score shows it. This is not a distant risk: procurement teams and their carrier partners face it now, in this tender cycle.

Primary data means measured data from real operations. Carriers that already collect it under a shared standard do not need to build an answer for this bid, because they already have one.

What forwarders managing multi-carrier networks can do

A forwarder that bids on a shipper's tender is only as strong as the weakest data answer from its carriers. Asking every carrier on every lane for a consistent figure with a documented method, one by one, takes too much time. It does not work for this quarter's tenders, and it will not work for next year's. The best-placed forwarders already know, for every carrier they book, which method was used. They also know which data quality tier supports the number. As a result, they do not need to ask each time.

How CO2Path is built for this

CO2Path produces what this season's RFPs ask for: a figure for each shipment, calculated under ISO 14083 and GLEC. CO2Path attaches the method and the data quality tier every time, in the same way for every customer and every bid. A carrier or forwarder that uses CO2Path does not have to write a special response to each tender. Instead, it produces the answer that the tender asks for as part of its normal work.

CO2Path helps you answer this season's RFP data requirements → Request a demo


Frequently asked questions

Shippers that fall under CSRD must report Scope 3 Category 4 figures that an assurance review can check. A general statement from a carrier, such as "we calculate our emissions", is no longer enough. This used to be an unstated expectation, but now it is a scored requirement in the tender documents that shippers issue for next year's contracts.

Four things. First, a named method (ISO 14083 and the GLEC Framework). Second, a stated data quality tier: whether the figure comes from primary fuel data or from a regional default. Third, data for each shipment instead of an annual average. Fourth, and more and more, a standard document such as a GLEC Declaration instead of a custom one.

In a growing share of current tenders, yes. Data quality is scored together with price and transit time, and it is not an optional question. A bidder that gives a named method and a stated data quality tier answers what the tender asks. In contrast, a bidder that relies on an industry-average estimate does not.

A forwarder's tender response is only as strong as the weakest carrier data in its network. The practical answer is therefore to agree on one shared method and one data quality disclosure with every carrier in advance. This is better than asking each carrier for a special answer each time a tender arrives.

It started with large shippers that fall directly under CSRD, and it is now moving to smaller companies quickly. These large shippers pass the same requirement to every forwarder and carrier they contract, whatever the size of that partner. As a result, a small carrier that bids into a large shipper's network faces the same requirement as a large carrier.

See CO2Path in action

Pick a slot that suits you. You'll get a Google Meet invite and reminders.

  • 30 minutes. Or longer if you want to go deeper.
  • No sales pitch. We find pushy salespeople as tiring as you do.
  • Bring your whole team. Everyone's welcome to join.

Pick a time

Open booking in a new tab ↗